British Poetry Collection Study Guide
Color Theme
Font Style
Sans Serif System Mono Accessible
Text Size
The Collar
George Herbert (1593-1633)
Free form (irregular lines)

About This Poem

The Collar is Herbert's most dramatic poem, beginning with a violent gesture — the speaker strikes the table and declares rebellion against God's service. The irregular lines and agitated rhythms enact the speaker's fury as he catalogs his grievances: he has suffered thorns instead of harvest, his joys have dried up. But the title puns on "choler" (anger), "collar" (restraint), and "caller" (God who calls), and the magnificent final four lines — "Methought I heard one calling, Child! / And I replied My Lord" — collapse the entire rebellion with devastating simplicity.

Translation Style
✨ Character Voice Translations PREMIUM
Original Text
I struck the board, and cried, 'No more; I will abroad! What? shall I ever sigh and pine? My lines and life are free, free as the road, Loose as the wind, as large as store. Shall I be still in suit? Have I no harvest but a thorn To let me blood, and not restore What I have lost with cordial fruit? Sure there was wine Before my sighs did dry it; there was corn Before my tears did drown it. Is the year only lost to me? Have I no bays to crown it, No flowers, no garlands gay? All blasted? All wasted? Not so, my heart; but there is fruit, And thou hast hands. Recover all thy sigh-blown age On double pleasures: leave thy cold dispute Of what is fit and not. Forsake thy cage, Thy rope of sands, Which petty thoughts have made, and made to thee Good cable, to enforce and draw, And be thy law, While thou didst wink and wouldst not see. Away! take heed; I will abroad. Call in thy death's-head there; tie up thy fears; He that forbears To suit and serve his need, Deserves his load. But as I raved and grew more fierce and wild At every word, Methought I heard one calling, Child! And I replied My Lord.
Modern English
Select a style above to load the modern English translation.
Literary Analysis of "The Collar" by George Herbert

Historical and Literary Context

George Herbert's "The Collar," published in his collection The Temple (1633), emerges from a period of profound religious and social upheaval in seventeenth-century England. Written during the reign of Charles I, when tensions between religious authority and individual conscience were intensifying, the poem reflects the spiritual anxieties of the metaphysical poets. Herbert himself was an ordained Anglican priest who struggled with questions of vocation and obedience to God, making this poem deeply autobiographical in its exploration of religious doubt.

As a metaphysical poet, Herbert employs the characteristic wit, intellectual complexity, and emotional intensity of his contemporaries like John Donne and Andrew Marvell. However, Herbert's work is distinguished by its focus on devotional themes and the intimate relationship between the soul and God. "The Collar" stands as one of his most dramatic and psychologically penetrating works, capturing the moment when faith is tested by human desire and rebellion.

Structure and Form

The poem's structure mirrors its thematic content with remarkable precision. Written in irregular lines of varying lengths, with an unpredictable rhyme scheme, the verse form itself enacts the speaker's emotional turbulence and psychological instability. This formal irregularity contrasts sharply with the ordered, measured verse that closes the poem, reflecting the speaker's movement from chaos to calm submission.

  • The poem consists of approximately 36 lines organized into irregular stanzas
  • The meter shifts between iambic and anapestic patterns, creating rhythmic instability
  • Enjambment is used extensively to propel the reader forward, mimicking breathless speech
  • The final couplet, "Methought I heard one calling, Child! / And I replied My Lord," is notably regular and controlled

This formal structure is crucial to understanding the poem's meaning. The chaotic verse form of the rebellion mirrors the speaker's internal disorder, while the sudden regularity and brevity of the conclusion suggest the restoration of spiritual order through submission to divine authority.

Key Imagery and Symbolism

Herbert employs rich and varied imagery to explore the tension between spiritual constraint and worldly desire. The "collar" itself functions as the poem's central symbol, representing both the restraint of religious vows and the constraints of duty and obligation. The title's pun—"collar" sounds like "choler," meaning anger—reinforces the speaker's emotional state.

  • The Board: Represents the altar or the table of religious duty; striking it is an act of rebellion against God's order
  • Freedom Imagery: "Free as the road," "Loose as the wind," "large as store" evoke worldly liberty and material abundance
  • Agricultural Imagery: Thorns, harvests, wine, corn, and tears create a complex picture of spiritual barrenness versus fruitfulness
  • The Cage and Rope of Sands: Represent the self-imposed constraints of religious scrupulosity and petty moral concerns
  • Death's-Head: A memento mori symbol representing mortality and the ultimate futility of worldly pursuits

The agricultural imagery is particularly significant. The speaker laments that his religious devotion has yielded only thorns rather than fruit, suggesting that obedience to God has brought suffering rather than spiritual nourishment. Yet this imagery is ultimately inverted when the speaker realizes that fruit does exist and that he possesses the hands to recover it—a recognition that true fruitfulness comes through submission rather than rebellion.

Major Themes

At its core, "The Collar" explores the fundamental tension between human desire for freedom and the constraints of religious obligation. The speaker's rebellion is not against God directly but against what he perceives as the unnecessary restrictions of religious life—the "petty thoughts" and self-imposed limitations that bind him.

The poem also addresses the theme of self-deception. The speaker convinces himself that his religious vows are arbitrary constraints, "a rope of sands" made solid only by his own acquiescence. He argues that he deserves better than a life of sighing and pining, that he should pursue the pleasures and honors available in the world. This argument is presented with considerable rhetorical force and psychological realism, making the speaker's rebellion sympathetic and understandable.

However, the poem's conclusion reveals a deeper truth: true freedom comes not through rebellion but through recognition of one's relationship to divine authority. The single word "Child!" spoken by God transforms the entire preceding argument. This is not a harsh rebuke but a tender reminder of the speaker's fundamental identity and relationship to God. The speaker's immediate response—"My Lord"—indicates a return to proper understanding and submission.

Emotional Impact and Psychological Realism

What makes "The Collar" particularly powerful is its psychological authenticity. The speaker's arguments are not strawman objections easily dismissed; they represent genuine human longings for freedom, pleasure, and recognition. The rapid-fire questions and exclamations convey real frustration and passionate desire. A reader might find themselves sympathetic to the speaker's position, even while recognizing its spiritual inadequacy.

The poem's emotional arc moves from explosive rebellion through increasingly frantic argumentation to sudden, quiet submission. This movement is not presented as defeat but as recognition—a moment of clarity in which the speaker understands his true nature and purpose. The emotional impact derives from the tension between these opposing forces and the resolution that comes through divine intervention rather than human will.

Significance and Legacy

"The Collar" remains significant for several reasons. It represents one of the most honest explorations of religious doubt in English literature, refusing to pretend that faith is easy or that obedience to God comes naturally. The poem acknowledges the legitimacy of human desire while ultimately affirming the value of spiritual submission.

For modern readers, the poem speaks to universal experiences of constraint and rebellion, duty and desire. While the religious context is specific to Herbert's time and faith, the psychological and emotional dynamics he explores remain relevant to anyone who has struggled with questions of purpose, obligation, and freedom.

Herbert's technical mastery in "The Collar" demonstrates how form and content can work together to create meaning. The poem's irregular structure, vivid imagery, and dramatic emotional trajectory make it one of the finest achievements of metaphysical poetry and a enduring testament to the power of religious verse to illuminate fundamental human experiences.

I struck the board, and cried, 'No more; I will abroad!'

This opening line establishes the speaker's rebellious rejection of religious constraint. The physical act of striking the board symbolizes his violent break from dutiful submission, setting the tone for his passionate outburst against the restrictions of spiritual service.

My lines and life are free, free as the road, Loose as the wind, as large as store.

The speaker uses natural imagery to express his desire for absolute freedom and abundance. The repetition of "free" and the comparison to wind and open roads emphasize his longing to escape the constraints he perceives in religious devotion.

Have I no harvest but a thorn To let me blood, and not restore What I have lost with cordial fruit?

This passage reveals the speaker's sense of spiritual injury and loss. He questions whether service to God yields only pain rather than nourishment, using agricultural and medical imagery to express his feeling that devotion has drained rather than replenished him.

Thy rope of sands, Which petty thoughts have made, and made to thee Good cable, to enforce and draw, And be thy law

Herbert uses the paradox of a "rope of sands" to describe how self-imposed restrictions, though seemingly fragile, become binding constraints. This reflects the speaker's realization that his own thoughts have created the very chains that bind him to religious duty.

But as I raved and grew more fierce and wild At every word, Methought I heard one calling, Child! And I replied My Lord.

This dramatic conclusion marks the speaker's sudden transformation. The gentle address "Child" interrupts his rage, and his immediate, submissive response "My Lord" reveals his ultimate acceptance of divine authority, suggesting that rebellion gives way to spiritual surrender and grace.

Leave thy cold dispute Of what is fit and not. Forsake thy cage

The speaker urges himself to abandon intellectual questioning and constraint. The "cage" metaphor captures how he views religious obligation as imprisonment, while the call to leave "cold dispute" suggests that rational argument against devotion is futile and self-defeating.

Loading tags...

Ask the Bard

Click any tag to explore where it appears across the play, then ask the Bard to explain how it works in this scene.

Exploring tag...
The Bard's Take
Ask the Bard to explain how this element appears in this scene
Click a tag to search.
Ask the Bard about this scene
Type at least 2 characters to search
Poets & Figures
Loading poets...
SIS Teachers
Sign in with your @siskorea.org email for free full access to this guide and all GradeWise study guides — every poem, translation, and premium feature.
Sign In with SIS Email